So after spending several months
working with the 36 megapixel Nikon D800, I figured it was time I
weighed in on all the hype over the new crop of high megapixel cameras
and the "problems" they create. Just like every other photographer, I am
a bit of a gearhead, so when I heard "36 megapixels" my mind started
racing with massive prints, major crops, shorter lenses, and greater
sales. Before ordering my D800 through Nikon Professional Services, I
tried hard to weigh my decision based the question "would the D800
improve my photography?" Being that I have already been happy with
20x30 prints from my D3s, and that the majority of my photo sales are
for publication, not prints, how could I justify spending the money for a
fancy new camera? Also, would my 5 year old computer handle the
enormous files, or was I also looking at investing in a new computer
system?
Being that I was happy with my D700 for my light-weight
body, how did I convince myself? It was the ability make major crops
that sold me. With a 36 megapixel file, my editors have the ability to
crop a vertical cover image from a small portion of a horizontal image.
Also, the higher video quality was a deciding factor, because more of
my clients are looking for someone who can do video and stills for their
projects.
Problems, you say? Well along with the massive file
size and amazing resolution, come a new set of issues. First, getting
sharp images is a lot harder than it was with a 12 megapixel camera,
because even the slightest lapse in technique shows as a glaring
mistake. With every camera I have owned in the past, I could shoot at
shutter speeds equal to or greater than my lens lengths, I now have to
double that number in order to be absolutely sure I am eliminating any
camera shake. (Mirror lockup is now even more important as well). It
is sort of like using a magnifying glass to look at a scene rather than
just using your naked eye. Small things that look fine to the eye now
stand out at higher magnification. Also, as I feared, I found that the
new files were so large that my high powered photo-editing desktop was
so slow I wanted to shoot myself. In the end, tripling my resolution
also required investing in an entirely new computer system, including
replacing my new Drobo hard drive because it was just too slow and
didn't support Thunderbolt.
So
is this camera for you? We all want the newest and the greatest
inventions, but I would argue that even though this camera is flying off
the shelves, most people are getting in over their heads. How often do
you actually print 20x30 or larger? How often do you crop more than
40-50%? Could you just get a little closer to your subject? If you mainly
post photos online, make 16x20 or smaller prints, or give slide shows,
you are not gaining anything over the 12 or 16 megapixel camera you
already have. I would say that for 90% of people, saving the money
spent on a new computer and camera for a cool new lens, trip of a
lifetime, or photo instruction, is a better choice. As the saying goes,
"the best camera is the one you have with you".
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
2013 Wild and Scenic Film Festival
Activist Craig Childs addresses a crowd
Each January the South Yuba River Citizens League puts on the largest environmental film festival in the country in Nevada City. For years I have been involved in various ways with the event, either showing work or helping to check tickets at the door. This year I decided it was time to donate my photography skill to help create publicity photos of the event. I had a wonderful time interacting and photographing film makers, volunteers, guest speakers, and of course famous rock climber Alex Honnold.
If you have never attended the Wild and Scenic Film Festival, you are missing out. With some of the most inspiring and educational films I have ever seen, I can't wait for next January.
Naturalist and Author John Muir Laws signs petition to protect Yuba River Salmon from a proposed Dam project.
Climber Alex Honnold being interviewed for upcoming film.
Filmmaker wins an award
Monday, January 28, 2013
Photographing Yellowstone In Winter
After just returning from my very first time shooting during the winter in Yellowstone, I can honestly say it should be a trip on EVERY photographer's list. It is like going on an African Safari in North America! For 6 days we explored the area between the North and Northeast entrance of the park on the only park road open during the winter. Along with Jen, we had the pleasure of hanging out with our great friends and locals Eric Rock and Melissa Scott who often guide wildlife and photography tours in the park.
No doubt I learned more about Yellowstone from spending a week with them then I would have learned in a month of prep with guidebooks. Their knowledge was key in understanding were to find specific species and why much of the wildlife moves to the north end of the park during winter. No doubt driving the road was like a winter African Safari.
Because we only had about a week to spend around the park, we opted to not take the Snow Coach to the interior sites like Old Faithful and the Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone. But rather focus on wildlife along the road where we had easier access and the ability to be based from our own vehicle.
I was a bit sad to miss some of these classic spots; but as a photographer I long ago learned it is better to focus on a small area rather than spread yourself too thin. Despite not getting close enough to photograph any Wolves in the Lamar Valley, hearing them howl while we watched them through binoculars was more than enough payoff for focusing our time in one area.
After spending a few nights in Cooke City and Gardiner we ended the Yellowstone leg of our adventure by soaking in the hot baths of Chico Hot Springs just North of the park for a night with several great friends from the Bozeman area.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)